Share:

Quality assessment of scientific papers: Excellence or legitimization of research practices?

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the relative efficiency of graduate programs in terms of the quality of their scientific publications in journals. To this end, we applied Data Envelopment Analysis to the fields of Public and Business Administration, Accounting, and Tourism, using data from the 2017 Quadrennial Evaluation developed by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior [“Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel”, CAPES]. The results suggest that efficient graduate programs are concentrated in the center-south axis of Brazil, in the areas of Administration and Accounting. Despite the overall publishing strategy in journals of various ranks (strata), efficient graduate programs allocate their efficiency primarily to Qualis A1 journals, A1 being the excellence rating in the CAPES scale. We conclude that legitimized research practices pressure graduate programs to improve the quality of their publications while threatening the survival of programs that fail to conform to the assessment rules.

Keyword : Institutional isomorphism, Efficiency, Scientific publications, Legitimacy Isomorfismo institucional, Eficiência, Publicações científicas, Legitimidade

How to Cite
Vilela, B., Cavalcanti, J., Freitas, K., & Carrieri, A. (2021). Quality assessment of scientific papers: Excellence or legitimization of research practices?. Brazilian Business Review, 18(6), 700–721. https://doi.org/10.15728/bbr.2021.18.6.6

Send mail to Author


Send Cancel